Freshwater national direction

Closes 27 Jul 2025

Section 2 part 2.7: Simplifying the fish passage regulations

There are questions that can be answered within part 2.7.

You can read part 2.7 and the questions either:

Read part 2.7: Simplifying the fish passage regulations - HTML format

The Government has committed to:

  • amending the NES-F to simplify culvert rules.

Context

The NPS-FM requires councils to provide for fish passage, and to identify and remediate existing barriers. It is supported by the NES-F, which provides for the construction of in-stream structures as a permitted activity subject to conditions, and requires a resource consent if these conditions cannot be met.

 

Fish passage rules may require too much information

Councils and land users have said that the amount of information required by the NES-F on the design of in-stream structures is too onerous. There are also concerns it can be difficult to satisfy the permitted activity conditions for constructing and using a culvert.

We are consulting on whether to simplify fish passage regulations in the NES-F or retain the current regulations. To simplify the regulations, we would:

  • move information requirements19 for each structure type into a single regulation that applies to all structure types20
  • remove requirements that do not directly inform how likely a structure is to impede fish passage (eg, the material used in construction21)
  • amend the permitted activity conditions for culverts to reflect updated practice and provide for boxed culverts22
  • remove some permitted activity conditions for culverts (eg, water velocity)23
  • consider whether temporary structures (eg, used in temporary works like gravel extraction) need to be treated differently to permanent structures, and whether this would be best achieved via a new permitted activity standard in the NES-F or by allowing councils to be less stringent than the NES-F for this purpose.

For further information on this topic, refer to the impact analysis document entitled Interim Regulatory Impact Statement: Amending the fish passage regulations in the NES Freshwater.

19 Information requirements are within regulations 63(3), 64(3), 65(3), 66(3) and 67(3) of the NES-F.

20 Regulation 62(3) of the NES-F.

21 For example, requirements in the NES-F for material of structure for culverts (regulation 63(3)(i)), weirs (regulation 64(3)(g)), flap gates (regulation 65(3)(f)) and dams (regulation 66(3)(f)).

22 Reword regulation 70(2)(e) of the NES-F to replace the 25% diameter requirement with 1/3 for circular or 300 mm for boxed culverts.

23 Remove regulation 70(2)(b), (c) and (g) of the NES-F; remove requirement at 70(2)(f) that the substrate is stable (retain requirement that substrate is present).

25. What information requirements are necessary for fish passage?

What would the difference in cost be, relative to current information requirements?

26. How can regulations for temporary and permanent culverts in the NES-F be made simpler?
27. Temporary culverts are currently treated the same as permanent ones. If temporary culverts were to be treated differently (eg, had fewer conditions), would it be better to do so through a permitted activity pathway in the NES-F (culverts only), or by allowing councils to be less stringent than the permitted activity conditions for culverts and weirs?
28. Have you encountered similar issues with any other policy or regulation within the NPS-FM or NES-F (eg, rules or gateway tests about river reclamation)?