Freshwater national direction

Closes 27 Jul 2025

Section 2 part 2.8: Addressing remaining issues with farmer-facing regulations

There are questions that can be answered within part 2.8.

You can read part 2.8 and the questions either:

Read part 2.8: Addressing remaining issues with farmer-facing regulations - HTML format

The Government has committed to:

  • removing the regulatory burden for farmers, replace the one-size-fits-all rules with local decision-making, and replace the NES-F (as committed to in the Coalition Agreements and pre-election manifesto policies). 24

24 The Coalition Agreement between the New Zealand National Party and New Zealand First; National Party manifesto documents, Getting back to farming and Primary sector growth plan.

Context

In 2024, the Government cut red tape for farmers by repealing the map of low-slope land in the Resource Management (Stock Exclusion) Regulations 2020 (Stock Exclusion Regulations) and simplifying intensive winter grazing rules.25 These changes were part of the Government’s move to a more risk-based, catchment-focused approach. There is more that can be done.

The Government wants to remove further regulations where the benefits of the rules do not outweigh the costs for the primary sector.

Note that proposed changes to the Stock Exclusion Regulations are set out in the Package 2: Primary sector discussion document.

25 Through the Resource Management (Freshwater and Other Matters) Amendment Act 2024.

NES-F rules for synthetic nitrogen fertiliser

Applying synthetic nitrogen fertiliser to farmland increases nitrate levels in the soil. Run-off from this soil can degrade our waterways.

Subpart 4 of Part 2 of the NES-F sets out rules for applying synthetic nitrogen fertiliser. Farmers can apply up to 190 kilograms of nitrogen per hectare per year without a resource consent. If they use more, they must apply for a resource consent. Dairy farmers are also required to provide receipts and information on fertiliser use once per year.

The initial year for reporting on the nitrogen cap (2021–22) had low compliance with reporting requirements and unreliable reported data. In response, several administrative changes were made, and compliance and reliability improved. However, implementing the nitrogen cap has been a work in progress, and concerns about the reliability of reported data remain.

Farmers and growers have improved their use of nitrogen fertiliser and continue to lift their uptake of good management practice. Publicly available data indicates a reduction in the use of synthetic nitrogen fertiliser in New Zealand in 2020–23.26

We are consulting on three options to improve the NES-F rules for synthetic nitrogen fertiliser, as set out below.

26 Fertiliser data includes: New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme reporting on nitrogen imported or manufactured in synthetic fertilisers (which shows a decrease of about 80,000 tonnes between 2020 and 2021); sales data reported by the Fertiliser Association (which shows a 12 per cent drop in fertiliser sales between 2020 and 2022); data collected by Stats NZ as part of the Agricultural Production Survey and Census (which shows a decrease in fertiliser application of approximately 10 per cent between 2020 and 2022).

Repealing the requirement for dairy farms to provide receipts

We are consulting on whether to repeal the requirement for dairy farms to provide receipts for purchases of synthetic nitrogen fertiliser.

This change would address concerns that the requirement to produce receipts is unnecessary because councils do not use the information provided. The receipts do not give an accurate measure of fertiliser applied, and the requirement is particularly onerous for farmers who are not affiliated with large fertiliser companies.

Aligning the reporting date for dairy farms with the farming calendar

We are also consulting on whether to align the reporting date in the NES-F with the farming calendar.

This change would address concerns that it is inefficient to require dairy farmers to report on their fertiliser use at a different time of the year from when they report on other matters.

Repealing the 190 kilogram per hectare nitrogen limit

We are consulting on whether to repeal the requirement for farmers to use less than 190 kilograms of nitrogen per hectare per year on the grazed area of their farms.

The introduction of the nitrogen cap in the current NES-F helped to increase awareness of nitrogen use, and it improved practice. We are seeking feedback on whether the cap is still necessary, given farmers and growers have improved their use of nitrogen fertiliser and continue to lift their uptake of good management practice. The rule is also an input control that may not actually control or reflect environmental risk/damage. Well-managed fertiliser, applied at higher rates than the regulations specify, can have limited environmental impact, while poorly managed fertiliser can have a negative impact, even if applied at lower rates.

For further information on this topic, refer to the impact analysis document entitled Interim Regulatory Impact Statement: Options to amend regulations for farming activities.

29. To what extent will it be more efficient to require dairy farmers to report on fertiliser use at the same time of year they report on other matters?
30. Has the requirement for dairy farms to report their use of fertiliser already served its purpose, in terms of having signalled a level of unacceptable use that should be avoided – no more than 190 kilograms per hectare per year – and if so, is this requirement still necessary?