REG projects can have both positive and adverse effects for tangata whenua and for land, water and other taonga. Although the proposals may have impacts on taonga, decision-makers will be required to consider REG benefits and other provisions alongside other relevant national direction (eg, the NZCPS and NPS-FM), regional policy statements, and regional and district plans. This helps decision-makers to effectively weigh up both positive and adverse effects of REG activities when considering a consent application.
The proposals improve on the 2011 NPS-REG, which does not include any policies that provide for Māori values, aspirations and engagement.16 The proposals are also more enabling of iwi-led REG activities, which has been a consistent request from Māori seeking greater electricity options and self-sufficiency. The proposals will not directly impact the decision-making process requirements under the RMA, Treaty settlements or other legislative arrangements, including the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act 2011 and the Ngā Rohe Moana o Ngā Hapū o Ngāti Porou Act 2019.
Treaty settlement agreements and related legislation continue to apply. Some Treaty settlements place obligations on councils, including involving iwi/Māori in plan development and decision-making and inclusion of policies in plans. The proposals do not present a risk to the operation of these Treaty settlement commitments.
Consultation will be necessary to test whether iwi, hapū and other Māori groups have concerns about the proposal or any perceived impacts on sites of significance to Māori, marae, Māori land, land returned under Treaty settlements, or other matters of significance to Māori groups.