NZ ETS unit settings and annual regulatory updates 2026

Closes 12 Jul 2026

Proposed changes to the NZ ETS regulations 2026: About this consultation

You can read about this consultation, the background, and the executive summary either:

Read about this consultation, background, and the executive summary - HTML format

About this consultation

This document outlines proposals for a range of updates to the regulations for the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). The regulations are made under the Climate Change Response Act 2002.

The Ministry for the Environment is seeking the insight, evidence and perspectives of participants in the ETS who may be directly affected by the proposed changes.

This year, we are consulting on:

  • technical updates relating to default emissions factors for 2027 that are based on recent data
  • waste updates that affect waste sector participants and remediation projects for historic contaminated waste.

Table 1 lists the proposed updates to ETS regulations in 2026.

Table 1: Proposed regulatory changes

Proposed changes Regulations

Update the default emissions factors for:

  • natural gas activities
  • geothermal activities
  • liquid fossil fuels.

Climate Change (Stationary Energy and Industrial Processes) Regulations 2009

Climate Change (Liquid Fossil Fuels) Regulations 2008

Waste updates

Update the default emissions factors for waste participants.

Remove the oxidation factor from unique emissions factor applications.

Increase information requirements for unique emissions factor applicants with high landfill gas capture rates.

Climate Change (Waste) Regulations 2010

Climate Change (Unique Emissions Factors) Regulations 2009

Exempt the disposal of waste from remediation of historic contaminated sites.

Climate Change (General Exemptions Order) 2009

We welcome submissions from anyone with an interest in the regulations on one or more of these matters.

Consultation on unit limits and price control settings

We are also consulting on a subset of the regulations for ‘unit limits and price control settings’ (ETS settings), which must be updated every year. These are presented in a separate consultation document: Annual Updates to New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme Limits and Price Control Settings for Units 2026.

How to have your say

The Government welcomes your thoughts on the proposals in this consultation. Your responses will help us to further understand the issues, options and impacts. Each section explains the problem and presents the analysis and proposed options. We have included questions about each proposal, but welcome all comments. To ensure your point of view is clearly understood, you should explain the reasons for your views and give supporting evidence if needed. See appendix 1 for the full list of questions (LINK).

We are also seeking feedback on the impact of proposed changes on Māori

We recognise that Māori have a significant interest in climate change action and the ETS. In our assessment, there is unlikely to be any specific impact on Māori resulting from any of the proposed updates, but we acknowledge the possibility of gaps in our analysis. Therefore, as well as questions on each proposed update, we are seeking feedback on whether any of the proposals could have an impact on Māori, either positive or negative.

Background

Role of the ETS

The Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) is the Government’s main tool to help New Zealand meet: 

  • its international obligations under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and Paris Agreement
  • 2050 targets: net-zero greenhouse gas emissions (except biogenic methane), and a 14 to 24 percent reduction in biogenic methane from 2017 levels
  • emissions budgets: a set of ‘stepping stones’ to reach the 2050 target.

All parts of New Zealand’s economy, except for agriculture, face costs for greenhouse gas emissions. The costs are from either:

  • purchasing and surrendering New Zealand Units (NZUs) to meet ETS requirements, or 
  • paying a fee based on the value of the NZU, through the Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Levy.

Participating in the ETS

Businesses that undertake activities outlined in Schedule 3 of the Climate Change Response Act 2002 (CCRA) are mandatory participants of the ETS. They are required to register, file annual emissions returns, and surrender the corresponding number of NZUs.

Businesses undertaking activities outlined in Schedule 4 of the CCRA, such as forestry removals, can choose to participate in the ETS. Doing so may earn them NZUs for removing carbon from the atmosphere, or other eligible removals.

Reporting emissions and surrendering emission units

Businesses calculate their emissions from activities taking place over a calendar year (the reporting period). Emissions returns are reported to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) by the end of the following March. Businesses must then surrender the equivalent NZUs to pay for their emissions.

Many businesses use a default emissions factor or unique emissions factor in their emissions reporting. These are used to convert reported data (eg, on production) into an emissions value. Default emissions factors are set directly in regulations, but participants must provide additional evidence and seek approval from the EPA to use a unique emissions factor.

The regulations that sit under the CCRA outline the information that participants must collect, report on and use to calculate their emissions. Regular reviews of these regulations keep them up to date and fit for purpose.

Executive summary

Table 2 outlines seven proposals to amend regulations under the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). The objective is to maintain the accuracy of, and confidence in, the scheme.

The amendments relate to:

  • default emissions factors (DEFs): These allow participants to convert data about their operations into emissions totals, so that they can report under the ETS
  • the waste sector: Landfill operators may use a unique emissions factor (UEF) if they can demonstrate that their disposal facility’s emissions are materially different from the DEF, such as those with a landfill gas capture system (LFG system).

Table 2: Seven proposed regulatory amendments under the Emissions Trading Scheme

Proposal Description Who will it affect?
Default emissions factor (DEF) updates
1. Update the DEFs for natural gas activities Use the latest Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) data to calculate new DEFs for use in the next emissions reporting period. This will ensure that reporting remains accurate.

Mainly businesses that buy natural gas in large quantities and opt into the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) for these emissions, and that may pass on the change in their emissions costs to the consumer.

The change should result in a decrease in emissions costs, on average, for those who use DEFs.

There are generally negligible broader economic implications (ie, the changes do not meaningfully influence the cost of living).

2. Update the DEFs for geothermal activities Use the latest EPA data to calculate new DEFs for the next emissions reporting period. This will ensure that reporting remains accurate.

Mainly businesses that operate geothermal power plants, and that may pass on the change in their emissions costs to the consumer.

The change should result in a decrease in emissions costs, on average, for those who use DEFs.

There are generally negligible broader economic implications (ie, the changes do not meaningfully influence the cost of living).

3. Update the DEFs for liquid fossil fuels Use the latest Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment data to calculate new DEFs for use in the next emissions reporting period. This will ensure that emissions reporting remains accurate.

Mainly businesses that import liquid fossil fuels, and that may pass on the change in their emissions costs to the consumer.

The change should result in a decrease in emissions costs, on average, for those who use DEFs.

There are generally negligible broader economic implications (ie, the changes do not meaningfully influence the cost of living).

Waste updates
4. Update the DEF for waste Use the most recent and accurate information to calculate the DEF for the next reporting period. There are four options: no change; a minor change using new evidence; and two moderate changes with a range of DEF options based on (a) activity source category or (b) landfill size and class.

Landfill operators, whether they use a unique emissions factor (UEF) or the default.

Higher accuracy could change the reported emissions. The direction of change depends on the data and evidence that operators provide.

5. Remove the oxidation factor from UEF applications

Currently, landfills with a landfill gas capture system (LFG system) can reduce their ETS obligations by accounting for the quantity of gas captured underground. When doing so, operators can subtract up to 10 percent of their emissions using an oxidation factor, despite oxidation occurring through the landfill cap rather than under it.

This proposal includes an option to change the oxidation factor to 0 because it has no impact on how much gas a system collects.

Landfill operators who have an LFG system and apply for a UEF.

May result in higher UEFs and reported emissions, but these will be more accurate.

6. Increase information requirements for UEF applicants with high LFG capture rates

Introduce a tiered approach for waste sector UEF applicants, where a higher bar of information is required when reporting high-efficiency capture rates for their LFG systems.

Some sites are already producing evidence of rates above 90 percent. This option would remove the current cap and allow claims of up to 100 percent capture in UEF applications. High-efficiency rates reduce ETS obligations, so it is important to have a high degree of confidence in the accuracy of these rates.

Landfill operators who have an LFG system and apply for a UEF.

May result in higher UEFs and reported emissions, but these will be more accurate.

For operators with evidence of high-efficiency rates over 90 percent, this change should reduce their reported emissions and thus reduce New Zealand Unit obligations.

7. Exempt the disposal of waste from remediation of historic contaminated sites Create an exemption for historic contaminated waste, which will be treated differently from ‘new’ waste. Costs paid by landfill operators and passed on to landfill users will better reflect emissions. It will also reduce the risk that the charges discourage remediation that brings important environmental and public health benefits.

Landfill operators, because it reduces the ETS costs they would otherwise face when accepting historic contaminated waste.

Organisations funding and carrying out remediation: any reduction in ETS costs is intended to be reflected in lower disposal costs for this material.

There are negligible broader economic implications. It applies only to remediation waste, rather than general waste.