Section 2: Defining lower intensity farming for the purpose of an exception
1. Do you consider stocking rate (ie, SU/ha) is an appropriate measure to define lower intensity farming or do you recommend a different approach?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
A different approach
Please explain your answer here
A good way to measure low intensity farming
2. What do you think is the appropriate stocking rate threshold (in SU/ha) for the definition of lower intensity farming?
Please explain your answer here
12 su/ha over the calander year
3. Do you think there should be different stocking rate thresholds for beef cattle and deer, or one threshold for all stock types?
Please explain your answer here
No su represents different stock classes
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Different stocking rates
Radio button:
Unticked
One threshold for all stock types
Radio button:
Unticked
Unsure
4. Is there any other information that you think we should consider in relation to developing an exception for lower intensity farming?
Please write your answer here
Yes areas that already have stocking limitations on them ie Doc Linz lease
5. Do you consider that there are any situations where an exception for lower intensity farming should not apply, and the map should continue to apply?
Please explain your answer here
No already protected and managed by other departments
6. Do you have any views on how those specific situations should be identified?
Please write your answer here
No
7. Is there information that is readily available to farmers and councils to support the implementation of an exception based on stocking rates?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Ticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Unsure
How is/should this information be used or shared by farmers and councils?
A farm plan
Section 3: Using certified freshwater farm plans
8. Do you consider that certified freshwater farm plans should be used as the basis for an exception, or an alternative, to the map and associated requirements to exclude stock?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Unsure
Please explain your answer here
Farm plan as they can be specific to an area to manage the land appropriately .the farm plan needs to be kept confidential
9. Is there any other information that you think we should consider?
Please write your answer here
Steward ship land is already managed by doc with stock limts
Section 4: Stock exclusion for natural wetlands
10. Do you consider that an exception for lower intensity farming systems, or the alternative approach using certified freshwater farm plans, should apply more broadly to natural wetlands?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Unsure
Please explain your answer here
Some areas need managed differently lower intensity farming applies minimal pressure to wetlands
11. Are there any situations where any exception, or the alternative approach using certified freshwater farm plans, should not apply?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Ticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Unsure
Please write your answer here
Best managed under farm plan.people can be proactive and positive
12. Is there any other information that you think we should we consider in relation to wetlands within lower intensity farming systems?
Please write your answer here
Cattle avoid the wet areas if managed under low stock units
Section 5: Other issues
13. Do you consider the definition of a permanent fence is too prescriptive, and that other fence types should be included?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Unsure
Please explain your answer here
Natural boundaries are present in many areas such as large rivers and steep mountains and the cattle will avoid them with a low stocking rate.also electronic barriers are being developed
14. Do you agree that amendments to the stock exclusion regulations should clarify that the map and associated requirements to exclude stock do not apply on slopes that are greater than 10 degrees?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Unsure
Please explain your answer here
Yes I believe the level of intensity is the issue and not the steepness or slope
15. Are you aware of any other issues with the stock exclusion regulations that should be addressed? And if so, why?
Please write your answer here
Not at this point