Have your say on options to reduce emissions from organic waste

Closes 12 Jul 2026

Section 2. Supporting councils to implement or enhance kerbside organic services

There are 7 questions that can be answered within Section 2.

You can read this section and the questions either:

Section 2 is one of the sections under Part A, which focuses on improvements to organic waste management.

Read more about Part A: Improvements to organic waste management (PDF 1.7MB)

Context

Council kerbside organic collections give hundreds of thousands of New Zealanders more choice on how to keep organic materials from their kitchens and gardens out of landfill. Having accessible and effective systems in place to divert organic materials from households is important, as over 200,000 tonnes of food scraps were estimated to have been sent to landfill through household kerbside rubbish collections in 2023.27

A portion of New Zealanders compost or have worm farms at home, returning nutrients to their soil and gardens, or feed it to animals. But many of us lack the space or ability to compost at home. Some use community composting facilities, such as community gardens or compost hubs, or pay for collection by local providers. 

For many households, having a food scraps or food organics and garden organics (FOGO) collection bin provided to their property makes it easier to keep organic waste out of their landfill bin, without having to compost, organise a private collection or transport organic materials off site. 

Kerbside organic collections have been shown to be an effective method for diverting food waste from landfill. A trial by Wellington City Council from 2020 to 2022 tested the effectiveness of diverting food waste through kerbside collection by providing a weekly kerbside food waste collection service to 500 households, and comparing the results with another 450 households composting at home. 

Results from waste audits showed that kerbside collection was more than twice as effective as home composting in diverting food waste from landfill in this trial. On average, the amount of food waste going into landfill bins fell by 38.8 percent per household when a kerbside collection bin was provided, compared with a 16.4 percent reduction per household when home composting.28

27 WasteMINZ. 2024. Organic Waste Collection and Processing: Guidance for Local Authorities (PDF 10.1MB). Auckland: WasteMINZ.

28 Wellington City Council. Para Kai Miramar Peninsula Trial. Retrieved 7 May 2026.

Case study: Christchurch City Council organic collection nearly 20 years old

Christchurch City Council introduced its FOGO kerbside collection service in March 2009 as part of a city wide strategy to reduce landfill waste and increase resource recovery. The service provides all eligible rateable properties with an 80 litre green organics bin, which is collected weekly. Rateable properties have the option to upgrade to a 240 litre bin for an additional charge. Non rateable properties such as schools, churches and community groups can also opt in to the collection as a paid service. 

When the organic collection began, approximately 47,000 tonnes of organic waste were collected from households each year. Since then, the annual total has increased to around 53,000 tonnes. Participation rates have remained relatively stable, with 54 percent use by residents with FOGO bins in 2009 and 53 percent in 2026. Levels of contamination (people putting non-allowable materials in bins) have remained consistently low, reducing from an initial 1.0 percent to less than 0.5 percent in 2026. 

Marketing and behaviour change initiatives play a key role in maintaining service quality. The council uses seasonal campaigns and an app to help residents check what the FOGO service accepts.

Since the introduction of the FOGO service in Christchurch, approximately 820,000 tonnes of organic material have been diverted from landfill to produce high quality compost. Christchurch City Council is now preparing to transition from composting to an anaerobic digestion system. Construction of the facility is underway, with the aim to be producing biogas by 2027. 

Good progress has been made in establishing organic collections across New Zealand councils since 2006. By the end of 2026, 22 councils will be offering organic waste collections,29 representing 33 percent of all territorial authorities and covering 65 percent of New Zealand’s urban population. 

However, two-thirds of all councils still do not have kerbside organic collections in place. In addition, where such collections exist, initial feedback from council officers indicates that fewer residents take up the service than expected. The feedback identifies a range of barriers to implementing organic collections and achieving planned participation and diversion rates, including:

  • fiscal constraints and increasing costs
  • lack of political and public support
  • issues with the availability and proximity of organic processing infrastructure
  • resource challenges, and the need to align with existing priorities and service commitments set through six-yearly Waste Management and Minimisation Plans (WMMPs)
  • changes in national policy direction
  • residents’ perceptions of and behaviours when separating and handling decomposing organic materials. 

Introducing a kerbside organic collection service also takes time, working in with the staged cycles of a council’s Annual Plan and 10-year Long-Term Plan, along with the WMMP as noted above. Any additional services need to be included in advance in the priorities and planned service delivery outcomes of a WMMP, as this informs how councils may use waste levy funding. 

We welcome feedback from councils on barriers to implementing kerbside organic collections – including potential operational, implementation, usage or funding barriers – so that we can better understand councils’ needs in growing New Zealand’s collection of organic materials at kerbside.

29 Rotorua Lakes District Council and Ashburton District Council are both planning to launch new kerbside organic collections in the second half of 2026.

Read about the options we are seeking feedback on - HTML format

To refine options, we received input from a representative group of council officers across the country, who work in councils both with and without kerbside organic collections. The following four refined options are presented for feedback from all councils and, where relevant, from the waste and resource recovery sector.

2.1 Develop standardised modelling tools for territorial authorities to help scope and contract kerbside collections

Standardised models, developed with input from councils, could include a cost–demand model that can be filled with local population data, transport distances, processing infrastructure availability and location, bin and processing types, and collection frequency. 

This option would help with early concept modelling of the economic case for adding kerbside organic collections and avoiding long-term landfill costs. Such modelling would then support councils to investigate organic collections before developing a business case and seeking approval from elected members to include it in a WMMP. Modelling tools could also help scope the potential for regional reduced-cost procurement or contracting – potentially reducing costs to individual councils and helping develop value-for-money collaborations across councils.

2.2 Share resources with territorial authorities to support them in optimising household use of kerbside organic services

Increasing participation in existing food scraps and FOGO collections is valuable, as this increases diversion of organic materials from existing funded collections and lowers operational costs for councils with increased tonnage. Low uptake of organic collections by residents and contamination of collections with non-allowable materials are widespread challenges across councils. These challenges particularly affect smaller councils that have limited staff resources and limited communications capability to run education campaigns, or to audit and give feedback on residents’ bins. 

Useful existing resources to support councils with these challenges include:

  • the Waste Management Institute New Zealand (WasteMINZ) waste collection and processing guidance for local authorities30
  • guidance from the Ministry for the Environment (the Ministry) on best-practice communications for waste minimisation31
  • a recommendations report on organic waste contaminants, prepared for the Ministry32  
  • research on barriers to use of food scraps33 and FOGO collections34
  • a Ministry literature review of best-practice interventions to reduce business (and household) food waste35
  • Ministry website information for the public on food scraps36 and FOGO collections.37  

We could explore how best to increase councils’ knowledge and use of these resources, and what public outreach techniques are most useful in helping increase residents’ use of organic collection services. The Ministry could also create additional tools, run webinars for council staff, and share council case studies and information on organic collections and processing occurring across New Zealand. If there was demand, the Ministry could work with councils to run local and/or national education campaigns on reducing contamination in kerbside organic collections and promoting their value.

30 WasteMINZ. 2024. Organic Waste Collection and Processing: Guidance for Local Authorities (PDF 10.1MB). Auckland: WasteMINZ.

31 Ministry for the Environment. 2023. Best practice communications for waste minimisation: A guide to support effective behaviour change within households (PDF 6.1MB). Wellington: Ministry for the Environment. 

32 Wilson D, Anderson C, Ormsby T, Lewis A, Stoner R, Whetu A. 2024. Contaminants Present in Organic Waste: Phase 3 Recommendations Report (PDF 3.2MB). Prepared for the Ministry for the Environment by Eunomia. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.

33 Sunshine Yates Consulting. 2023. Research into Barriers to Use of Food Scraps Collections (PDF 1MB). Prepared for the Ministry for the Environment by Sunshine Yates Consulting. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.

34 Sunshine Yates Consulting. 2024. Research into FOGO Bin Use – FOGO Bin Audits (PDF 3.4MB). Prepared for the Ministry for the Environment by Sunshine Yates Consulting. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.

35 Ministry for the Environment. 2022. Reducing household and business food waste: Literature review (PDF 1.8MB). Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.

36 Ministry for the Environment. Kerbside recycling: food scraps. Retrieved 7 May 2026.

37 Ministry for the Environment. Kerbside recycling: food and garden organics collections. Retrieved 7 May 2026.

2.3 Fund trials for increasing uptake of kerbside organic collections and share findings nationally

Making separation of food scraps as easy as possible for residents is one of the most important factors in diverting food scraps from landfill – communications can only help so much.38 Councils are working to increase household uptake of kerbside organic services, but resourcing and budgets for trials can be limited, particularly for smaller councils. 

The Ministry could fund targeted, time-limited trials of different interventions to support kerbside organic collections. The results of these trials could then be shared with councils nationally, in a format transferable across different council contexts, to support evidence based decision making. 

For example, Auckland Council and Ruapehu District Council already supply (or make available at a cost) compostable liners with benchtop kitchen caddies, which residents empty into outside food scraps bins. Other councils have expressed interest in trialling whether liners increase participation. Funded time limited trials in some areas could further test how much liners increase residents’ use of existing kerbside organic collections and provide councils with further information on this option.

38 Ministry for the Environment. 2023. Best practice communications for waste minimisation: A guide to support effective behaviour change within households (PDF 6.1MB). Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.

2.4 Showcase organic waste reduction and diversion as a climate change mitigation tool

Public awareness of how food scraps and FOGO collections contribute to emissions reduction (through avoided methane from landfills) is generally low. In the 2025 Waste Behavioural Trend Monitoring Survey, when asked about motivations for reducing food waste, just over half of respondents (51 percent) were concerned about food waste in landfills contributing to greenhouse gas emissions.39 By comparison, stronger motivators included food waste feeling wrong (86 percent), valuing the effort it takes to produce food (81 percent), saving money (79 percent), and concerns about global food shortages (68 percent). This suggests people may not fully understand how reducing and diverting food waste helps lower emissions, and reduces climate change impacts.

Increasing awareness of emissions reduction from organic collections through Ministry communications (eg, website updates or social media channels) could support greater uptake of existing kerbside organic collections and build needed support among residents for new collections. 

39 AK Research. 2025. 2025 Waste and Resource Efficiency – Behavioural Trend Monitoring Survey. Prepared for the Ministry for the Environment by AK Research. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.

2. General questions on council kerbside organic services

2a. Does your council currently offer a kerbside organic (food scraps or FOGO) collection?

2.1. Develop standardised modelling tools for territorial authorities to scope and contract kerbside collections

2.1a. Do you support the option to develop standardised modelling tools for territorial authorities to scope and contract kerbside collections?

2.2. Share resources with territorial authorities to support them in optimising household use of kerbside organic collections

2.2a. Do you support the option to share resources with territorial authorities to support optimising household use of kerbside organic collections?

2.3. Fund trials for increasing uptake of kerbside organic collections and share findings nationally

2.3a. Do you support the option to fund trials for increasing uptake of kerbside organic collections and share findings nationally?

2.4. Showcase organic waste reduction and diversion as a climate change mitigation tool

2.4a. Do you support the option to showcase organic waste reduction and diversion as a climate change mitigation tool to the public?

2.5. Which of these options should be prioritised?

Which options would have the most impact and should be prioritised for implementation? Please rank from 1 (highest priority) to 4.

2.6. Examples or evidence

To make sure your response can be read, please upload in a PDF or Word format.

Please make sure your file is under 25MB