Response 754238488

Back to Response listing

Submitter details

1. Submitter name

Individual or organisation name (Required)
Redacted text

General consultation questions

0.1. What do you think is working well in New Zealand to reduce our emissions and achieve the 2050 net zero target?

Please explain your answer here.
Absolutely nothing, except the govt spending taxpayer's money making climate alarmists rich

0.2. The Government is taking a ‘net-based approach’ that uses both emissions reductions and removals to reduce overall emissions in the atmosphere (rather than an approach that focuses only on reducing emissions at the source). A net-based approach is helpful for managing emissions in a cost-effective way that helps grow the economy and increase productivity in New Zealand.

What do you see as the key advantages of taking a net-based approach?
As above, nothing is achieved as man-made climate change does not exist.
What do you see as the key challenges to taking a net-based approach?
Key challenge is how the taxpayers can stop govt from wasting their money

0.3. What, if any, other sectors or areas do you think have significant opportunities for cost-effective emissions reduction?

Please write your answer here
Government, to cancel their climate change plans and focus on real issues, such as the road infrastructure and housing

0.4. What Māori- and iwi-led action to reduce emissions could benefit from government support?

Please write your answer here
Cancelling to climate change plan will benefit everyone, why single out Maori?

Chapter 1: Our approach to New Zealand’s climate change response | Tā mātou e whai nei e pā ana ki tā Aotearoa urupare ki te panoni āhuarangi

1.1. What opportunities do the proposed initiatives and policies across the sectors offer for Māori- and iwi-led action to reduce emissions?

Please write your answer here
Nothing is achieved as man-made climate change does not exist. Why single out Maori, are they special?

1.2. What additional opportunities do you think the Government should consider?

Please write your answer here
Cancel climate change money wasting and focus on things that can benefit everyday Kiwis, such as housing and the terrible road infrastructure

Chapter 2: Tracking our progress towards meeting emissions budgets | Te aroturuki i tō tātou koke i te ara whakatutuki i ngā tahua tukunga

2.1. Current modelling suggests that with a changed approach, the first emissions reduction plan is still sufficient to meet the first emissions budget. What, if any, other impacts or consequences of the Government’s approach to meeting the first emissions budget should the Government be aware of?

Please write your answer here
That they are wasting taxpayer money and should cancel all proposed plans

2.2. What, if any, are the long-term impacts from the changes to the first emissions reduction plan on meeting future emissions budgets that should be considered through the development of the second emissions reduction plan?

Please write your answer here
There is no long-term impact, for example the sea levels has not risen on 100's of years, why would it now?

Chapter 3: Strengthening the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme | Te whakakaha i te Kaupapa Hokohoko Tukunga o Aotearoa

3.1. What else can the Government do to support NZ ETS market credibility and ensure the NZ ETS continues to help us to meet our targets and stay within budgets?

Please write your answer here
Cancel all targets and plans, and focus on helping everyday Kiwis

3.2. What are the potential risks of using the NZ ETS as a key tool to reduce emissions?

Please write your answer here
Wasting money

3.3. How can the Government manage these risks of using the NZ ETS as the key lever to reduce emissions?

Please write your answer here
There will be no risks whatsoever if all plans and spending is cancelled

3.4. Do you support or not support the Government’s approach of looking at other ways to create incentives for carbon dioxide removals from forestry, in addition to using the NZ ETS?

Please select one item
Yes I support
No I don't support
Unsure

3.5. Apart from the NZ ETS, what three other main incentives could the Government use to encourage removals through forestry?

Please write your answer here
Nothing, leave the forests alone

3.6. Please provide any additional feedback on the Government’s thinking about how to use the NZ ETS to reduce emissions.

Please write your answer here
Cancel all plans and spending related to the climate change hoax

Chapter 4: Scaling private investment in climate mitigation | Te whakakorahi tā te rāngai

4.1. Do current measures work well to unlock private investment in climate mitigation?

Please select one item
Yes
Partially
No
Unsure

4.2. What are the three main barriers to enabling more private investment in climate mitigation?

Write your first barrier here
The people of NZ does not believe in the climate change hoax, so they do not want to participate, yet govt is marching ahead
Write your second barrier here
Private investors are not interested, so leave them alone

4.3. What are the three main actions the Government can do to enable more private investment in climate mitigation for the next 18 months?

Write your first action here
Cancel the plans
Write your second action here
Cancel spending
Write your third action here
Fire everyone in govt working on climate change plans

4.4. What are the three main things the Government can do to enable more private investment in climate mitigation in the longer term (beyond the next 18 months)?

Write the first here
Let private investors decide themselves where to invest. Guaranteed it will not be the climate change hoax

4.5. Please provide any additional feedback on the Government’s thinking about how to enable more private investment in climate mitigation for the next 18 months.

Please write your answer here
Just leave the private sector alone

Chapter 5: Energy | Te pūngao

5.1. What three main barriers/challenges that are not addressed in this chapter do businesses face related to investing in renewable electricity supply (generation and network infrastructure)?

Write your first barrier here
Reopen Marsden point and use our own natural resources

5.2. How much will the Government’s approach to driving investment in renewable energy support businesses to switch their energy use during 2026–30 (the second emissions budget period)?

Please select one item
A lot – it will make a large difference  
A moderate amount - there will still be other barriers  
Little to none – it will make no meaningful difference
 Unsure 

5.3. What three main barriers/challenges do businesses and households face related to electrifying or improving energy efficiency, in addition to those already covered in the discussion document?

Write your first barrier here
Reopen Marsden point and use our own natural resources

5.4. How much will existing policies support private investment in low-emissions fuels and carbon-capture technologies?

Please select one item
A lot – it will make a large difference  
A moderate amount – there will still be some barriers  
Little to no difference – it will make no meaningful difference  
Unsure  

5.5. What three main additional actions could the Government do to enable businesses to take up low-emissions fuels and carbon-capture technology?

Write your first action here
Reopen Marsden point and use our own natural resources

5.6. If you are an electricity generator, please explain and/or provide evidence of how Electrify NZ could affect projects already planned or underway.

Please write your answer here
Reopen Marsden point and use our own natural resources

5.7. If you are an electricity generator, please explain and/or provide evidence of how Electrify NZ could increase the likelihood that new projects will be investigated.

Please write your answer here
Reopen Marsden point and use our own natural resources

5.8. Please provide any additional feedback on the Government’s proposals to reduce emissions in the energy sector and the industrial processes and product use sector.

Please write your answer here
Reopen Marsden point and use our own natural resources

Chapter 6: Transport | Te tūnuku

6.1. Do you support the proposed actions to enable EV charging infrastructure?

Please select one item
Yes I support
No I don't support
Unsure

6.2. What are the three main actions the Government can do to reduce barriers to and enable the development of a more extensive public EV charging infrastructure in New Zealand (without adding too much cost for households and businesses)?

Write your first action here
Reopen Marsden point and use our own natural resources

6.3. Do you support the Government’s proposals to reduce emissions from heavy vehicles?

Please select one item
Yes I support
No I don't support
Unsure

6.4. What are the three main actions the Government can do to make it easier to switch to low- and zero-emissions heavy vehicles (without adding too much cost for households and businesses)?

Write your first action here
Trucks can't do long distance with batteries, pretty simple

6.5. Do you support the Government proposals to reduce emissions from aviation and shipping?

Please select all that apply
Yes I support
No I don't support
Unsure

6.6. What opportunities might there be from rolling out new technologies to reduce emissions from aviation and shipping?

Please write your answer here
Planes can't fly on batteries

6.7. What are the three main actions the Government can do to make it easier to reduce emissions from aviation and maritime fuels (without adding too much cost for households and businesses)?

Write your first action here
Reopen Marsden point and use our own natural resources

6.8. Please provide any additional feedback on the Government’s thinking about how to reduce emissions in the transport sector.

Please write your answer here
Fix the roads, then less will be spent on fuel

Chapter 7: Agriculture | Te ahuwhenua

7.1. What are the three main barriers or challenges to farmer uptake of emissions-reduction technology?

Write your first barrier here
They can't afford it
Write your second barrier here
They grow food, not emissions
Writer your third barrier here
Cows don't fart CO2

7.2. How can the Government better support farm- and/or industry-led action to reduce emissions?

Please write your answer here
Cancel all taxes on farmers related to emissions

7.3. How should Government prioritise support for the development of different mitigation tools and technologies across different parts of the agriculture sector?

Please write your answer here
No mitigation required, CO2 is our life, not a dangerous gas

7.4. What are three possible ways of encouraging farmer uptake of emissions-reduction tools?

Cancel the taxes on farmers
Write your second here
Stop forcing farmers to "lessen their carbon footprint" which is bs anyway
Write your third here
Leave farmers be, let them grow food

7.5. What are the key factors to consider when developing a fair and equitable pricing system?

Please write your answer here
Don't tax farmers

7.6. Please provide any additional feedback on the Government’s thinking about how to reduce emissions in the agriculture sector.

Please write your answer here
Cancel all climate change plans and spending

Chapter 8: Forestry and wood processing | Te ahumahi ngāherehere me te tukatuka rākau

8.1. How could partnerships be structured between the Government and the private sector to plant trees on Crown land (land owned and managed by the Government)?

Please write your answer here
Why would you want to plant trees if you plan to cancel CO2? There will be no life on earth, including plants

8.2. What are the three main actions the Government could do to streamline consents for wood processing?

Write your first action here
.

8.3. How large should the role of wood in the built environment play in New Zealand’s climate response?

Please select one item
Less than currently  
About the same as currently  
More than currently  
Unsure  

8.4. What other opportunities are there to reduce net emissions from the forestry and wood-processing sector?

Please write your answer here
Make the all use battery operated tools and equipment - see how far that gets you :)

8.5. Please provide any additional feedback on the Government’s thinking about how to reduce emissions in the forestry and wood-processing sector.

Please write your answer here
Govt is not thinking, they are following the rest of the world

Chapter 9: Non-forestry removals | Ngā tangohanga ngāherehere-kore

9.1. What are the three main opportunities for non-forestry removals to support emissions reduction?

Write your first opportunity
Stop spraying our skies with chemicals - chemtrails
Write you second opportunity
Stop spraying our skies with chemicals - chemtrails
Write your third opportunity here
Stop spraying our skies with chemicals - chemtrails

9.2. What are three main barriers to developing more non-forestry removals?

Write your first barrier here
Chemtrails
Write your second barrier here
Weather manipulation

9.3. It is important to balance landowners ability to use their land flexibly with the recognition of the role of non-forestry removals. How can this balance be achieved?

Please write your answer here
Leave landowners alone and don't force anything relates to this climate change hoax

9.4. What three main benefits beyond emissions reductions could be created by developing more non-forestry removals?

Write your first benefit here
Zero

9.5. What risks and trade-offs from incentivising land-use and management change to reduce net emissions need to be considered?

Please write your answer here
More taxpayer funds spending

9.6. Please provide any additional feedback on the Government’s thinking about how to reduce emissions through non-forestry removals.

Please write your answer here
Whatever you try CO2 will not be reduced, as it has not been for 1000's of years

Chapter 10: Waste | Te para

10.1. Do you agree or disagree that the Government should further investigate improvements to organic waste disposal and landfill gas capture?

Please select one item
Agree
Disagree
Unsure

10.2. What is the main barrier to reducing emissions from waste (in households and businesses or across the waste sector)?

Please write your answer here
Cost to the taxpayer

10.3. What is the main action the Government could take to support emissions reductions from waste (in households and businesses or across the waste sector)?

Please write your answer here
Reduce landfill fees

10.4. Please provide any additional feedback on the Government’s thinking about how to reduce emissions in the waste sector.

Please write your answer here
Stop recycling, we know it all ends up in a landfill somewhere, either or NZ or being shipped overseas.

Chapter 11: Helping sectors adapt to climate change impacts | Te āwhina i ngā rāngai ki te

11.1. What are the three main barriers to managing climate risks through emissions reduction policies in this discussion document?

Write your first barrier here
It's all a load of rubbish through fear-mongering, similar to the covid scam. Just stop, please!

11.2. What are the three main benefits of managing climate risks that can come from the emissions reductions policies in this discussion document?

Write your first benefit here
There are no benefits, only drawbacks

11.3. What are some examples of how businesses and industries are already managing climate risks?

Please write your answer here
Very few do, because they don't believe it exists, like most clear thinking people

11.4. How can these kinds of activities be further supported?

Please write your answer here
Cancel all plans and spending, and all of NZ will benefit

11.5. Please provide any additional feedback on the pathway the Government has set out for managing climate risks from emissions reduction activities.

Please write your answer here
NZ Govt needs to wake up and stop believing the scaremongering

Chapter 12: Addressing distributional impacts of climate mitigation policy | Te whakatutuki i ngā pāpānga tohatoha o te kaupapahere whakamauru panoni āhuarangi

12.1. What are the main impacts of reducing emissions on employees, employers, regions, iwi and Māori, and/or wider communities that you believe should be addressed through Government support?

Please write your answer here
You said it yourself, low-income families will bear the brunt of this senseless program

12.2. Do you think additional climate-specific services, supports or programmes should be considered by the Government over the coming years?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
Please write your answer here
How about a referendum to find out if the people of NZ believe in climate change. If less than 50% then abolish EVERYTHING!